Realism1866

The Sleepers

Gustave Courbet

Curator's Eye

"The entanglement of naked bodies on rumpled sheets, accentuated by the contrast of hair colors (brunette and redhead) and broken jewelry, symbols of total surrender."

A monumental exploration of sapphic eroticism, where Courbet sublimes carnal realism to create an icon of transgression and female intimacy.

Analysis
Painted in 1866, at the twilight of the Second Empire, "The Sleepers" was a private commission for the Turkish-Egyptian diplomat Khalil-Bey, a great collector of erotica who also owned "The Origin of the World." In this context of rigorous censorship under Napoleon III, Courbet broke free from academic codes. Unlike the mythological nudes of Bouguereau or Cabanel, Courbet refused any allegorical excuse. He did not paint goddesses, but real, palpable women, whose flesh shows fatigue and pleasure, anchoring the work in a radical social and physiological realism that shocked his contemporaries. The mythological analysis of the work operates through a systematic subversion. While sleep is a classic theme linked to Hypnos or the abandonment of Psyche, Courbet strips it of its sacred dimension to turn it into a "myth of the flesh." One can see in it a modern rewriting of the myth of the Bacchantes, but without the tumult: here, the intoxication is that of the senses and the exhaustion following the embrace. The myth is no longer in the sky, but in the alcove. It is a desacralization of the female body which, through its plastic power, ends up acquiring a new form of profane transcendence, far from disembodied nymphs. Technically, Courbet demonstrates exceptional material virtuosity. He makes extensive use of the palette knife to sculpt the paint, giving the linen an almost mineral texture. The light, coming from an invisible source on the left, caresses the bodies with a softness that contrasts with the brutality of the subject for the time. The skin tones are worked with overlapping glazes, rendering the transparency of the skin and the underlying venous network. The dark background and deep blue curtains create a nocturnal setting that brings out the milky brilliance of the bodies, isolating the lovers in a space-time outside the social world. The psychology of the work lies in the expression of surrender and vulnerability. The two women, Joanna Hiffernan (the redhead) and a brunette model, are depicted in a heavy, almost lethargic sleep. The broken pearl necklace on the sheet is a major psychological detail: it symbolizes the break with social conventions and the eruption of wild desire into the bourgeois order. Courbet does not only seek to show a past sexual act, but to capture the state of grace and absolute fatigue that follows transgression. It is a study on silent complicity and the self-sufficiency of female pleasure, a revolutionary subject for the time.
The Secret
A well-kept secret of this work lies in the identity of the models. The redhead is none other than Joanna Hiffernan, known as "Jo," the lover of James Whistler and probably that of Courbet himself. Her presence in this work caused a definitive rupture between the two painters. Recent infrared reflectography analyses have shown that Courbet had initially planned a more cluttered composition with objects, before simplifying the space to focus attention solely on the flesh, strengthening the emotional impact of the void around the bodies. A fascinating anecdote concerns the fate of the painting. After the bankruptcy of Khalil-Bey, the work disappeared from public circulation for decades, kept in private collections behind curtains or covers, due to its "scandalous" nature. It was not until the mid-20th century that it was fully recognized as a masterpiece of modern art. Scientists have also noted the presence of extremely expensive blue pigments (lapis lazuli) in the shadows of the sheets, proving that Courbet considered this commission a first-rate artistic challenge, despite its clandestine destination. Finally, the detail of the perfume bottle and the sponge in the foreground is often interpreted by curators as a direct allusion to intimate hygiene, a raw realism that reinforced the "pornographic" character of the painting for Victorian morality. Yet, today, we see in it a still life of incredible finesse, almost Chardinesque, which anchors the fantasy in domestic everyday life, making the scene even more subversive because it is "normal" and not phantasmagorical.

Join Premium.

Unlock
Quiz

What was the scandal surrounding this painting when it was created?

Discover
Institution

Musée du Petit Palais

Location

Paris, France