Baroque1639
Self-Portrait as the Allegory of Painting
Artemisia Gentileschi
Curator's Eye
"The artist represents herself in a dynamic working posture, breaking with the static self-portraits of the time. One observes the gold chain with a mask pendant and disheveled hair, precise iconographic attributes described in Cesare Ripa's Iconologia."
A conceptual feat where Artemisia Gentileschi merges her own face with the allegory of Painting (La Pittura). It is a declaration of artistic independence and a virtuoso technical demonstration of a woman asserting herself as the very essence of her art.
Analysis
In this masterpiece of maturity painted during her stay in London, Artemisia Gentileschi achieves what no male painter could: physically embodying the allegory of her profession. According to the iconographic tradition of the Renaissance and Baroque, allegories were systematically represented with female features. By painting herself as "Painting," Artemisia does not settle for a self-portrait; she merges her real identity with the divine and abstract entity of pictorial creation, asserting that her existence and her art are inseparable.
The work is directly inspired by Cesare Ripa's "Iconologia," the reference manual for symbols of the time. To represent Painting, Ripa prescribes a woman with arched eyebrows, scattered hair symbolizing creative fury, and wearing a gold chain with a mask hanging at the neck, symbolizing the imitation of nature. Artemisia scrupulously respects these codes while infusing them with a striking physical reality. We see the effort in her arm, the concentration in her averted gaze, and the reality of a studio where the artist is truly at work, far from a courtly pose.
This analysis reveals a major socio-political depth. At a time when female painters were often confined to still lifes or delicate portraits, Artemisia places herself at the heart of the noblest action. She shows her rolled-up sleeves, her paint-stained hand, and her leaning posture, emphasizing that painting is as much laborious manual labor as an intellectual quest. She claims a place that the society of the time often denied her: that of a master capable of conceiving and executing complex works.
Finally, the mythological and philosophical dimension is present in the lack of eye contact with the viewer. Unlike most self-portraits that seek to engage in dialogue, Artemisia looks at her invisible canvas. She defines herself by her action and not by the gaze of the other. She becomes the instrument of "Divine Painting," transforming the creative act into a form of active meditation where the thinking subject and the created object merge in the movement of the brush.
The mastery of light and textures, especially the green satin of her dress and the skin of her arms, highlights her technical virtuosity. She proves she possesses the "maniera," the stylistic ease sought by the greatest collectors, including King Charles I of England, who was the first owner of this exceptional canvas.
The most fascinating secret of this painting lies in the technical feat required for its creation. To paint herself at this complex angle—in profile and in full action—Artemisia had to use a system of two mirrors positioned angularly. This configuration explains the slight but brilliant distortion of her posture. It is not a simple pose; it is an optical capture of her own body in motion, which was a major technological and artistic innovation for the 17th century.
A well-kept secret concerns the gold chain and the mask. Although these are attributes of "La Pittura," some historians see a subtle jab at her male detractors. The mask symbolizes imitation, but here it hangs inertly on her chest while she, the living artist, creates. It is a way of saying that while others imitate, she alone lives art from the inside. The mask, often associated with deception, is here reduced to a simple jewel, dominated by the real creative force of the woman.
X-ray analysis revealed a compositional secret: Artemisia initially painted her hands differently. There was more hesitation in the positioning of the brush. By reworking the right hand so it lunges with more vigor toward the upper corner of the canvas, she reinforced the authoritative aspect of her gesture. She absolutely wanted to avoid any softness that could be interpreted as "feminine weakness" by the critics of the Royal Collection.
The fourth secret concerns the "disheveled" hair. While Ripa recommended it for the allegory, Artemisia uses it to hide a personal detail: she had no maid to help her style her hair during her solitary painting sessions in London. What passes for an intellectual symbol of "creative fury" is also a pragmatic reality of an independent, hard-working woman who sacrificed social appearance for the necessity of the work.
Finally, the painting contains a mystery related to its patron. It was long believed to be a direct commission from Charles I, but recent research suggests that Artemisia painted it on her own initiative to serve as a monumental "business card" for the English court. She sent this painting as irrefutable proof of her genius, using allegory to bypass prejudice and establish herself as an inescapable figure of the European Baroque.
Join Premium.
UnlockQuiz
In terms of technical construction, what spatial feat does Artemisia achieve to represent herself from this specific angle of "La Pittura"?
Discover
